Click to viewYou can read about it all you want , but to be in its presence is another matter altogether . And no , I ’m not talking about Frucci . We gave you asugary biff of its sweetnesslast Friday on website , but now here are some of the expert item and a nerdier picture gallery of our experience with Panasonic ’s 103 - inch $ 70,000 1080p plasma wunderscreen .
https://gizmodo.com/103-inch-hdtv-xbox-360-nerdgasm-293313
Its official name is TH-103PZ600U , and it ’s technically part of a plasma line that emerged last year . If you want to purchase what could be more or less consider a 50 - inch variation of it — screen wise one one-fourth of the area — you’d devote just$2,100 at Amazon .
But as you have already seen , that extra 53 diagonal inches come straight from heaven , and with it came some loading . It ’s the same 4,000:1 line ratio , nice and rich as plasma tends to be when compared to alike LCD technologies . resilient activity is great with no blur or heebie-jeebies , as we had expected given what we ’ve seen of Panasonic ’s diminished plasmas .
But those lowly plasm did n’t want 12 downcast - rev devotee draw at all times , like this spoiled boy did . To be fair , I ’ve had desktop estimator with noisier fans , and the 8″ wall mount did n’t have any sort of especial exhaust system to help the hotness dissipate . In fact , as you may see in the gallery , Panasonic internal product handler Karl DeManss had no problem standing up inside the wall mount :
Nevertheless , the TV does take a 220V wall socket , like a freakin ’ clothes dryer , so you got ta consider the impact to the electrical card . ( Then again , if you ’re in the marketplace for a $ 70,000 TV , perchance you do n’t . )
remark - wise , the unit we get to play with had RGB , portion video and DVI / HDMI , but picture only . There are no verbaliser , though it does have small 3 - W amps for BYO talker . As I noted in the uncrating , it is a modular system , much like the commercial displays from Panasonic and Pioneer : you enjoin them which input you need , and they whap them in . I believe there were four proprietary slots in the strip , which you’re able to see in the gallery . Each slot could take at least one comment .
Contrary to our own concern , the warm - up time was unperceivable — the screen went on straight forth . Also , the pixels themselves were not as visible as we had feared . I was promise “ screen doorway ” like crazy , but for most of us , the picture element disappear at about 70 inches of distance ( for me , they disappear around 80 in ) . And you ’re in spades not function to need to stick out as close as Adam wasduring his Bioshock delirium . After a while , he had to sit down to keep from falling over .
Have a feeling at the gallery to see some of the particular of our hand - on . Note the sacred “ dime bag mental test ” to gauge pixel size , and the tape touchstone — bind by Panasonic displays president Andrew Nelkin and me — to insure that it was in fact 103″ , when we had heard through the grapevine that it may , in reality , be a 102 - incher . ( The overall dimensions are 56″ eminent by 95″ across by 5″ bass . )
Bottom line : Would I want one ? Nope . WHAAA ? ? Okay , so yeah , I would love one . But Sharp told me that its finish is to have wall - sized liquid crystal display in the come class . And if Panasonic is as competitive as I think , it will lead off promote the boundary too . Bottom line of descent is either bigger sets or chintzy 103s . Either way , we win . Hang on tight , cuz it ’s proceed to be a wild drive .
In case you neglect the “ uncrating ” characteristic over the weekend , check it out .
https://gizmodo.com/uncrating-a-103-inch-panasonic-plasma-gallery-293395
home entertainmentPanasonicPlasmas
Daily Newsletter
Get the honorable technical school , scientific discipline , and civilization news in your inbox daily .
News from the time to come , fork up to your present .
You May Also Like
