include among them were 60 professors at leading U.S. research institutions , include Harvard University , Standford University , and the University of California San Francisco ( UCSF ) , as well as one Nobel laureate . The researcher urged Zuckerberg to “ consider stricter policy on misinformation and incendiary language that harm the great unwashed , ” especially give the current unrest over police brutality and racial injustice .
In particular , the group cite Facebook ’s conclusion to leave up a late Facebook military post from President Donald Trump that state “ when the looting starts , the shot starts ” in mention to ongoing protest . Last week , Zuckerberg announced that the situation — despite being a clear call for functionary to open fire on demonstrators — somehow does n’t violate the platform ’s policy against inciting violence .
“ We were disconcerted to see that Facebook has not take after their own policies in regards to President Trump , who has used the Facebook platform to distribute both misinformation and incendiary statement , ” read the letter obtained bythe Washington Post .
Photo: Chip Somodevilla (Getty Images)
“ As scientist , we are consecrate to investigating shipway to better our human beings , ” the alphabetic character continues . “ The paste of measured misinformation and dissentious language is straight off antithetical to this destination and we are therefore deep implicated at the stance Facebook has take . ”
The President of the United States ’s statement also seems to campaign afoul of Facebook ’s moderation policies based on testimony from Zuckerberg himself . During a Congressional earshot in 2019,Zuckerberg told Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio - Cortezthat “ If anyone , including a politician , is enounce things that can get , that is calling for violence or could lay on the line imminent physical hurt , we will take that content down . ”
But when this dedication was put to the test , Zuck bow down out , thus proving what most everyone already suspected : That the same content moderation rules do n’t apply to political big wigs on Facebook ’s platform .
“ It ’s not our Book of Job to tell Mark Zuckerberg how to run his company , ” University of Utah prof Jason Shepherd , one of the organizers behind the letter , said in an interview withthe Post . “ But we require to at least voice a concern [ about ] his conflicting missions that we are involved in . ”
https://gizmodo.com/facebook-will-uhh-stop-promoting-the-boogaloo-race-1843926546
Facebook ’s controversial conclusion was heavy criticized by its own employee as well , who stageda virtual walkouton Monday in protestation . Several home documentsobtained bythe Postshowed many Facebook workers were appalled by the fellowship ’s deficiency of activeness . Several postulate if Facebook is in some sort of “ an scurrilous relationship ” with the Chief Executive based on its inability to censor his hateful and dangerous grandiosity .
In response to this backlash , Zuckerberg publisheda Facebook poston Friday that pay hatful of sass service of process review the company ’s policies without outlining any concrete plans for modification .
Black Lives MatterDonald TrumpFacebookGeorge FloydInstagramMark Zuckerbergpresident horn
Daily Newsletter
Get the good technical school , science , and acculturation news show in your inbox day by day .
News from the future , fork out to your present .
Please pick out your desired newssheet and submit your e-mail to upgrade your inbox .
You May Also Like
