The California - base environmental group , Earth Island Institute , have filed a cause against 10 turgid company , include Coke , Pepsi , and Nestlé , for their part in creating a plastic pollution “ nuisance ” , as well as spreading misinformation about the recyclability of their shaping packaging .
Last Wednesday , February 26 , 2020 , the courtship was filed in San Mateo county superior court , asking that the company pay to correct the damage their fictile befoulment has caused to the world and refrain from merchandising products as reusable , when by and magnanimous they do not end up in reality being recycled at recycle facility , due to thesheer volumeand cost , as well as screen out capabilities of local facilities .
“ This is the first of what I believe will be a wave of cause seeking to confine the plastics industry accountable for the unprecedented raft in our ocean , ” Josh Floum , Earth Island Institute ’s instrument panel president , tell in astatement .

Around150 million metric tonnesof charge card currently domicile in the sea , with between 8 and 20 million extra tonne of plastic added each twelvemonth to this form , grant to researchestimates . At this charge per unit , plastic is gear up tooutweigh fishin the sea by 2050 . In the plaintiff ’s courtship , they reason that pliant contamination has a detrimental impact on the environment and its inhabitants .
From beach cleaning conducted as part of aninternational auditlast year , single - economic consumption shaping publicity was gather by over 72,000 volunteers across 51 commonwealth and categorized by brand . It was found that the majority of pelagic plastic pollution can be trace back to a handful of major companies . The cause name calling 10 of the most abundant brands in this search : Coca - Cola , Nestlé , Pepsi , Mondel?z International , Mars , Procter & Gamble , Colgate - Palmolive , Crystal Geyser , and Danone .
“ The product that we are targeting in our lawsuit are contained in plastic packaging that is designed to be used for a short period of sentence , sometimes just a few minute of arc , ” Earth Island ’s General Counsel Sumona Majumdarsaid . “ And yet , this packaging pollutes our bodies from one generation to the next , and our satellite for centuries . ”

This is not the only charge the environmental grouping are convey frontwards to the companies ; Earth Island also think that consumer are being mislead by them . Consumers are told by these company that their plastic is reclaimable , therefore it is expected that if the item is placed in a recycling bin ( or other facilities such as this ) , then the position is taken maintenance of . However , much of the time , this is n’t the case .
old bailiwick have suggested that less than 10 percent of primary charge plate produced isrecycled , but the late flop of the recycling market could see this numberdecrease further . The suit contend that companies have continued to generate new “ virgin charge plate ” , the production of which has increased200 - foldsince 1950 , due to its bargain rate .
“ The Coca - Cola Company and our other defendants churn out billion of tons of plastic packaging each yr and desire us to think that it is all being reuse , ” Majumdarsaid . “It ’s a misinformation campaign , like to those used by Big Tobacco , Big Oil , and Big Pharma . Now is the time to concord Big Plastic similarly accountable . ”
All of this does not mean to dissuade client from recycling , executive director of Earth Island Institute David Phillips , told theGuardian , rather the lawsuit is about pee-pee companies take responsibility for the waste from their product .
In response to the lawsuit , a spokesman for the American Beverage Association , which represents Coca - Cola and Pepsi , amongst others , told IFLScience : “ Plastic waste is a world problem that demand thoughtful solutions . America ’s beverage society are already taking action to address the issue by abbreviate our use of new credit card , investing to increase the collecting of our bottles so they can be make over into new bottles as think , and collaborating with legislators and third - company experts to achieve meaningful insurance policy resolutions . ”
Mondel?z International , one of the companies being sued by Earth Island Institute , tell IFLScience that they do n’t annotate on active litigation . However , they emphasized their commitment to make 100 percentage of their publicity recycle - quick by 2025 , in purchase order to reach their ultimate goal of creating zero net waste packaging .
A spokesperson carry on : " We ’re form heavily to understate and create new materials that can be recycle , provide recycling selective information on - ingroup and most significantly working with partners across manufacture , governments and NGOs to both incent consumer behavior and put the base in place to ensure packaging does n’t terminate up in the surround . "
We pass out to the other company involve in the lawsuit ( Nestlé , Mars , Procter & Gamble , Colgate - Palmolive , Crystal Geyser , and Danone ) , and have n’t heard back by the time of publication .